Brad Simpson,...HK Luger Follow-Up...?

bradsimpson · 07-17-2002, 06:08 PM

Guys,
Sorry for the late reply, I've been out of the office. Looks like much has been said since I've been away.

I know both parties that you are asking about. I have had conversations with both parties. But I don't feel obligated to repeat what other people have said. Then I can be accused of heresay. And don't they deserve the right to speak for themselves?

This is an open forum, and I've tried to stick to the facts. I will defend what I write (this time I've merely pointed out an example that has been photographed, written, printed, & published by others.) They are free to defend themselves too.

Regarding this issue, I challenge to be proven wrong on what I've written on this forum:

The gun pictured on pages 175 and 179 of the Krieghoff Parabellum are the same gun. The date and condition were boosted to make a rare mint variation. You can clearly see from the pictures that this is the same gun. Look at the serial numbers, machining marks, etc.

There are many questions about this issue that I can't answer. I can only state what I know, and defend those facts.

I beleive (hope) that in an open forum the truth will come to light.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

07-17-2002, 06:08 PM	#11
bradsimpson User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Galesburg, IL Posts: 135 Thanks: 0 Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts	Guys, Sorry for the late reply, I've been out of the office. Looks like much has been said since I've been away. I know both parties that you are asking about. I have had conversations with both parties. But I don't feel obligated to repeat what other people have said. Then I can be accused of heresay. And don't they deserve the right to speak for themselves? This is an open forum, and I've tried to stick to the facts. I will defend what I write (this time I've merely pointed out an example that has been photographed, written, printed, & published by others.) They are free to defend themselves too. Regarding this issue, I challenge to be proven wrong on what I've written on this forum: The gun pictured on pages 175 and 179 of the Krieghoff Parabellum are the same gun. The date and condition were boosted to make a rare mint variation. You can clearly see from the pictures that this is the same gun. Look at the serial numbers, machining marks, etc. There are many questions about this issue that I can't answer. I can only state what I know, and defend those facts. I beleive (hope) that in an open forum the truth will come to light.