H. Jones' Book - 1917 Erfurt Artillery ?

Dwight Gruber · 10-06-2002, 02:41 PM

Pete,

re: 1. Having been a professional photographer, and owning a number of Lugers myself, I can imagine two guns being taken down for direct comparitive photography of a particular part--in fact, I have seen exactly those photographs.

If I may further speculate from my experience, two Lugers would probably be disassembled on a different surface than the actual copy stand from which the photographs are made. The photographer might not be the only person handling the guns--an assistant might be handling the parts, or the respective guns' owners. The course of such a photo session, particularly if a lot of different aspects of the guns are being documented, tends toward the kind of inattention which results in misassembly. And yes, that's pretty sloppy work.

re: 2. Without directly answering your question, Still's Acknowledgements in "Imperial Lugers" at least illuminates the situation. For the authoritative answer, ask Jan.

re: 3. Pretty low-odds assumption, that. Most likely answer: because there aren't any, and nobody's gotten around to faking them yet.

--Dwight

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

10-06-2002, 02:41 PM	#4
Dwight Gruber User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Portland, Oregon Posts: 3,908 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts	Pete, re: 1. Having been a professional photographer, and owning a number of Lugers myself, I can imagine two guns being taken down for direct comparitive photography of a particular part--in fact, I have seen exactly those photographs. If I may further speculate from my experience, two Lugers would probably be disassembled on a different surface than the actual copy stand from which the photographs are made. The photographer might not be the only person handling the guns--an assistant might be handling the parts, or the respective guns' owners. The course of such a photo session, particularly if a lot of different aspects of the guns are being documented, tends toward the kind of inattention which results in misassembly. And yes, that's pretty sloppy work. re: 2. Without directly answering your question, Still's Acknowledgements in "Imperial Lugers" at least illuminates the situation. For the authoritative answer, ask Jan. re: 3. Pretty low-odds assumption, that. Most likely answer: because there aren't any, and nobody's gotten around to faking them yet. --Dwight