Top 10 K�¼ Theories

[Vlim]

Johnny,

Of course a unit marking is possible, but this is mostly observed in groups that want to share a common identity. If the K�¼ marking would be found on standard pistols with standard acceptance marks, this would be my best guess too.

The problem with K�¼ marked guns is their combination of out of the ordinary markings, pointing towards an identifying purpose for the marking, other than that of a unit.

As John D. neatly stated: Finding a description to explain "K�¼" is one thing, finding a description that explains the Luftwaffe acceptance stamps, the fact that they were not produced for the luftwaffe, the fact that most are reworks and the K�¼ mark is the real challenge.

I am wondering if the placement of the K�¼ mark (before or after the serial number) can be explained by the theory that pre-K�¼ marked ones are made from surplus parts, that were unnumbered to start with and that post-K�¼ marked ones are reconditioned ones that already had a serial number?

A safe assumption is that pre-K�¼ ones were assembled on site X, while post-K�¼ ones were assembled on site Y.

Any thoughts or comments on this?