Help identify odd Old frame unmarked Luger

JLD1504 · 10-19-2024, 12:54 PM

Dwight

To follow up your informative and fascinating insight into 10056B.

I have today examined # 10007 (no B or GL monogram) referenced by Fusil in his original article on this Forum at a museum in Finland. I have posted some pictures and made many mistakes in the narrative posted today on Jan's Forum that I am hoping you and other wise heads will correct! The converted spring job seen today is an even cruder armoury job than that on 10056B! My guess would be both are wartime examples of getting pistols back to the troops by mixing and matching after battle damage in the Winter and Continuation Wars.

Look forward to hearing further comments and corrections - like you this is a fascinating pistol I will see myself next month.

John

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-19-2024, 12:54 PM	#1
JLD1504 User Join Date: Oct 2023 Posts: 8 Thanks: 6 Thanked 12 Times in 4 Posts	Dwight To follow up your informative and fascinating insight into 10056B. I have today examined # 10007 (no B or GL monogram) referenced by Fusil in his original article on this Forum at a museum in Finland. I have posted some pictures and made many mistakes in the narrative posted today on Jan's Forum that I am hoping you and other wise heads will correct! The converted spring job seen today is an even cruder armoury job than that on 10056B! My guess would be both are wartime examples of getting pistols back to the troops by mixing and matching after battle damage in the Winter and Continuation Wars. Look forward to hearing further comments and corrections - like you this is a fascinating pistol I will see myself next month. John