sear safeties

[Doubs]

Originally Posted by gunbugs

And I will note that while I think a Glock is a fine firearm, and generally VERY reliable, I do not own one, because I just don't care for them. Much the same as I don't care for Pepsi.

Agree completely. My son likes Glocks but, like you, they do nothing for me.

The only handguns I own that are striker fired are my Lugers. Every other handgun I own has a hammer, most exposed but a few with them internally.

[gunbugs]

I'm not sure I understand the heartache over the sear safety on a police luger. It is what is known as a "passive" safety and requires no manipulation by the user, you don't have to turn it on, or turn it off, plus it is dead simple, just a piece of spring steel and a rivet. If it bothers you a WHOLE bunch, you can remove it without much trouble.

[Doubs]

Originally Posted by gunbugs

I'm not sure I understand the heartache over the sear safety on a police luger. It is what is known as a "passive" safety and requires no manipulation by the user, you don't have to turn it on, or turn it off, plus it is dead simple, just a piece of spring steel and a rivet. If it bothers you a WHOLE bunch, you can remove it without much trouble.

No heartache whatsoever. Just expressing an opinion that it's the solution to a problem that would have been better addressed with training. I own a couple of Lugers with the sear safety and have no intension of removing them. They're part of the gun's history.