![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 21
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
Can anyone post images of the breechblock striking abutment of both an unreinforced and reinforced frame for visual comparison?
This is new to me and very interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Botetourt County, Virginia
Posts: 120
Thanks: 93
Thanked 140 Times in 46 Posts
|
Quote:
The first photograph, below, is of the rear wall of a DWM M1906 s/n 47109. This pistol was manufactured before the change in proofing of 1912, so still retains the "BUG" proofs. It has the un-reinforced striking abutment. Notice that there is a "shelf" or undercut below the rear frame details that articulate with the rear of the toggle. If you are interested to see detailed photography of this Luger, you can click this link: http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=26597 The next photograph is from my post #5, above showing a reinforced rear frame. There is no "shelf" or undercut below the mill details as seen on the un-reinforced rear frame. There's more "meat", in the rear wall of the reinforced frame, as the frame has been thickened in its rear wall. I hope this tidbit is helpful. Curl
|
|
|
|
|
| The following 11 members says Thank You to CptCurl for your post: |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,119
Thanked 5,286 Times in 1,728 Posts
|
Quote:
Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
|
|
|
|
| The following 4 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|