![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#4 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
|
Without going down the rabbit hole of complicated speculation, the simplest explanation is that the barrel was changed sometime after 1912, and re-proofed under the new nitro proof system. To factually determine this--or not--requires close hands-on examination.
There is not evidence that the adoption of the nitro proof was anything other than a hard changeover, which would not provide for a transition period with the possibility of mixing actual proof stamping. --Dwight |
|
|
|
| The following 2 members says Thank You to Dwight Gruber for your post: |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|