LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 08-12-2003, 12:05 AM   #29
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,742
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,788 Times in 590 Posts
Post

I agree with Norm on almost all points. Our Army did adopt the Garand in 1936 while the Marines insisted on keeping their version of the 1903 Springfield. The Marines learned on Guadalcanal that the Garand was the better battle rifle and moved swiftly to replace the '03. In the book "Shots Fired in Anger" (an excellent book, BTW) the author points out that the Garand proved to be the more reliable weapon and if the gas system failed could be manually operated more quickly than the bolt of an '03. The soldiers in the Philippines and on Wake Island were armed with the '03 rifle when the war broke out so it's true that many US servicemen entered the war with bolt actions but the Garand quickly became the standard. We were the only major power to use semi-automatic rifles as standard issue and it gave us a tremendous advantage in a fight.

The English began the war with the #1 Mk III rifle and slowly replaced it with the #4 rifle which was officially adopted in 1939.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com