Damaged carbine

Ron Wood · 03-18-2018, 08:39 PM

OK, my 50% was a ballpark number. If you consider the specified +/- 0.02mm tolerance on both measurements, the difference could be as small as 0.075mm [(0.83X1.5) - 1.17 = 0.075], slightly smaller than the diameter of a human hair. So, splitting hairs, I think 50% is close enough.

DonVoigt · 03-18-2018, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Wood

OK, my 50% was a ballpark number. If you consider the specified +/- 0.02mm tolerance on both measurements, the difference could be as small as 0.075mm [(0.83X1.5) - 1.17 = 0.075], slightly smaller than the diameter of a human hair. So, splitting hairs, I think 50% is close enough.

I did not mean it was not about 50%!

It makes interesting reading for anyone who wants a little more info.

03-18-2018, 08:39 PM	#1
Ron Wood Moderator 2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso Posts: 7,040 Thanks: 1,106 Thanked 5,256 Times in 1,724 Posts	OK, my 50% was a ballpark number. If you consider the specified +/- 0.02mm tolerance on both measurements, the difference could be as small as 0.075mm [(0.83X1.5) - 1.17 = 0.075], slightly smaller than the diameter of a human hair. So, splitting hairs, I think 50% is close enough. __________________ If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode