upload photo | donate | calendar
|
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
12-27-2017, 01:38 PM
|
#2 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
The common assumption is that metallurgy improvements were made and that the WW2 guns were less prone to metal failures. However, while it makes perfect sense, no one that I know of has actually conducted a test to verify that.
I can't fault your logic in shopping at Simpsons, Ltd, either. And while you could save a few bucks buying elsewhere, you are paying for peace of mind. Go for it! dju |
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post: |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode