Looking for help with 1917 Artillery Luger

[DonVoigt]

Originally Posted by Bill_in_VA

There’s no harm in prudence, but what I provided is far from “nebulous.” I’ll say though, I’m curious if you and others will demonstrate the same sense of...”concern” and assertiveness the next time someone posts a photo of Luger with a stock not specifically listed under Section III of the C&R list.
Anyway, I’ve said my piece and backed it up with statute and fact and case law, not emotion and panic.

Good grief Bill, I see no sign of "emotion or panic" here; and we have been consistent in saying that the stock is ok till "attached"(probably).

We do advise or warn guys about stock compatibility when odd combinations are posted. Some folks know about the rules, but many do not.

While you are correct that lugers and stocks may not be high on the ATF list for things to "go after", if they even have one, there are known "rules" that folks should be aware of and if one chooses one can stay inside the lines.

One thing that makes this one particularly egregious is that the stock is not remotely similar to any "original" stock , which are enumerated in the references you mention.

And that is all I have to say about that.

[Savage11]

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. I'm sure our founding fathers are spinning in their graves! These types of threads boil my blood!!

[DonVoigt]

Originally Posted by Savage11

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. I'm sure our founding fathers are spinning in their graves! These types of threads boil my blood!!

What irritates me is that the "founding fathers" could not write what WE think they meant to say, too many dangling modifying phrases that only confuse the issue and give those "against" ammunition.

[Savage11]

Originally Posted by DonVoigt

What irritates me is that the "founding fathers" could not write what WE think they meant to say, too many dangling modifying phrases that only confuse the issue and give those "against" ammunition.

Here here, couldn't have said it better myself!