upload photo | donate | calendar
|
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
08-23-2002, 02:23 AM
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 181
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Doubs:
Ok, then shouldn’t the explanation have been: not manufactured “no earlier than 1917”? And if it was a reject receiver from 1914, why doesn’t it have the appropriate stamp indicating this? If it was a good receiver from the beginning, why did they leave it sitting around from sometime in 1914 till sometime in 1917 (or later) for no good reason? |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode