LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 07-13-2017, 12:34 PM   #21
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,925
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,140 Times in 1,520 Posts
Default

I agree with Don. Something more like a short lug layered cannon breech lock would have been much more robust:



A slightly shorter striker with a thicker multi-lug support in the spring guide would have been a better design. Alas, we were not in the design meetings with Georg...

The ejector spring must have been complex to manufacture. We know that it was hardened prior to strawing. I wonder if the forward triangular ejector tab and mount were extruded from a single stock piece of metal?

Here's the patent. DRP 227078
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Breech_122m10_hameenlinna_2.jpg (89.1 KB, 465 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf LugerEjectorPatent_DE000000227078A_all_pages.pdf (164.2 KB, 216 views)
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to mrerick for your post:
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com