![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,374
Thanks: 7,447
Thanked 2,613 Times in 1,380 Posts
|
![]()
Your grips appear to be within the range of potential effective improvement. I have re-checkered several pairs that probably had even less "meat" to work with. One pair had had all the diamonds removed and the terrible beginnings of a new pattern. Those are in the first and third pics. Another set had very deep initials but allowed reasonable results nonetheless. Second and fourth pics. One grip scale revealed very handsome grain character when completed.
In the case of a 70's Mauser (or one of the Houston stainless examples from the 90's), the original grips are usually noticeably thicker than a you'd find on an original Parabellum. The Swiss style versions of the Mausers were made with a pattern that is annoyingly coarse, and it's best for shooting comfort to remove it entirely and reestablish a new, finer pattern which is easier on the hands. And since the thickness is somewhat reduced by the process, it will be much more friendly to use.
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,197
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
|
![]()
I would add my vote to the re-checker/repair option. I consider grips to be 'consumables', parts that are expected to wear and be repaired/replaced in the normal course of events. That the originals can be salvaged is a big bonus.
![]()
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|