![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 35
Thanks: 32
Thanked 23 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Robert in NC for your post: |
![]() |
#2 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 339
Thanks: 81
Thanked 359 Times in 198 Posts
|
![]()
I concur with your calculation. I went back to my scribbling, and plugged in the total sight radius.......8.1 I assume, and got the 0.22222222" number as you did. You did it more easily than I did, but in the end, agreement. Guess we both are hoping to help hit the mark.
I went on the Brownell's deal and it concurred as well with the 8.1 sight radius. Now........is that the real sight radius that is in mind?... ![]() I flubbadubbed the barrel length by using 4 inches(stupid on my part), rather than the total sight radius, so my initial numbers were out of wack. Sorry about that, but has been a long week here and then some. |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Rick W. for your post: |
![]() |
#3 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,528
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 3,711 Times in 1,014 Posts
|
![]()
First, thank you Kiwi Mark... Can you tell me what you ended up with in over all height of the front sight blade from top or sight base to top of sight?.. I'm guessing around .250" overall... And also thank you Robert, Rick, and Don.. you guys have opened my eyes some in the method behind the madness!!!!
![]() ![]() BTW, at this point, still looking like .225" / .250" / .300" ... still listening for suggestions though???..... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|