![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hello again,
many thanks for your answers, that was very helpful. I think i would not buy this gun after that. Maybe someone could rework that bad finish, but i think the metal looks quiet badly under that paint. It seems to be full of dents and scars, maybe that is the reason why it had been refinished. @kurusu: you are right, i think i'll take a look. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Newburgh,IN
Posts: 797
Thanks: 403
Thanked 640 Times in 339 Posts
|
Poker, welcome!
As mentioned, the gun was poorly refinished and there is evidence of corrosion. This one is not very good for an investment. But, could be good for a shooter. The photos don't reveal much more information. Unless it is extremely inexpensive, find and buy a better Luger. Please look at the FAQ section of this forum for very helpful information.
__________________
“God created war so that Americans would learn geography.” ― Mark Twain |
|
|
|
| The following 3 members says Thank You to Eugen for your post: |
|
|
#4 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,315
Thanks: 2,750
Thanked 999 Times in 734 Posts
|
In my opinion, for a first Luger, this would not be the one. There has been/still is, a lot of corrosion and pitting and we can not see the insides of the Luger. I would look elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|