LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Off Topic & Other Firearms

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-30-2016, 12:53 PM   #1
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angus Magnus View Post
...wait, what are we talking about here?
Form following function. There is too much emphasis put on 'style' than on function. The Wolverine .22 auto is just such an example. It was 'styled' futuristically, and ended up appealing to nobody.

Pistols like the Mauser C96, Borchardt, Browning High Power, Beretta 1934, even the Luger follow function. No one has tried to pretty them up. They succeeded on their own merits.

The Roth-Steyr is ugly. But it is true to its design.
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-30-2016, 03:10 PM   #2
Angus Magnus
User
 
Angus Magnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 133
Thanks: 8
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepherder View Post
Form following function. There is too much emphasis put on 'style' than on function. The Wolverine .22 auto is just such an example. It was 'styled' futuristically, and ended up appealing to nobody.

Pistols like the Mauser C96, Borchardt, Browning High Power, Beretta 1934, even the Luger follow function. No one has tried to pretty them up. They succeeded on their own merits.

The Roth-Steyr is ugly. But it is true to its design.
Honestly I don't even find Glocks ugly. Sure they don't have the sleekest lines like some Italian designs, but they do have their lego-like charm.

There are no ugly guns, just ugly rails.
Angus Magnus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-30-2016, 03:37 PM   #3
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,120
Thanked 5,287 Times in 1,728 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepherder View Post
...The Wolverine .22 auto is just such an example. It was 'styled' futuristically, and ended up appealing to nobody...
I disagree! It certainly appealed to me. It was the first handgun I ever shot. A buddy of mine bought one of the first ones in 1956 (it was only made from 1956 to 1958). It would fire as fast as you could pull the trigger and we shot many boxes of ammo without a malfunction. The ergonomics were super (the grip angle is more severe than a Luger but conveys the same “extension of your arm” feeling). We shot it so much that shooting became instinctive and we could hit shotgun shells tossed into the air with some consistency. The steel barrel and bolt assembly road inside the aluminum frame. There was no part of the frame that was involved in the firing function of the barrel and bolt so there was no wear at all on the frame. I liked it and eventually got one of my own which I still have.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Wolverine.jpg (32.1 KB, 109 views)
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is online now   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com