42 Mauser Chamber Dated 1939

[johnb55]

A couple of more pics for everyone to look over. Everything looks matching on this pistol, except for one grip and mag. I have a question for Mrerick. I see you also have a 1939 42. I posted a pic of the barrel sn and gauge (8.88). Do you see anything abnormal with my number when comparing it to your 1939. This pistols 8.88 is very close to barrel sn. Any feedback greatly appreciated. John

[johnb55]

Update on this lugers performance. I got to the range today and fired a couple of clips to see if any issues. Pistol worked fine, cycled with no problems.

I have a question for Eugen. I see that you have a 1939 like mine. I have been looking at this guns barrel numbers. Looking for a verdict if mine is kosher from board. 8.83 very close to serial number.

Thanks John

[Eugen]

Originally Posted by johnb55

Update on this lugers performance. I got to the range today and fired a couple of clips to see if any issues. Pistol worked fine, cycled with no problems.

I have a question for Eugen. I see that you have a 1939 like mine. I have been looking at this guns barrel numbers. Looking for a verdict if mine is kosher from board. 8.83 very close to serial number.

Thanks John

John, congrats on a successful range trip. I am sure you are happy that it went well.

That 8.83 is a barrel measurement performed by Mauser and not associated with the serial number. You can read more about it in the FAQS or one of the more knowledgeable members may provide more specific details. It looks legit to me, but I am new at this.

[Desperado]

Originally Posted by Eugen

That 8.83 is a barrel measurement performed by Mauser and not associated with the serial number. You can read more about it in the FAQS or one of the more knowledgeable members may provide more specific details. It looks legit to me, but I am new at this.

I think he is saying that he is concerned about the serial number being stamped where it is almost touching the bore numbers and is asking if this is "normal" for 1939's to be this close together - or was this a barrel that was stamped later and not too carefully by someone building up a luger.

[johnb55]

Eugen, yes very happy that everything went well. My question to the board is how do the barrel serial number and caliber measurement look in regards to being correct and original. Numbers look blued which is good, my concern is they look a little small.

[Eugen]

Originally Posted by johnb55

Eugen, yes very happy that everything went well. My question to the board is how do the barrel serial number and caliber measurement look in regards to being correct and original. Numbers look blued which is good, my concern is they look a little small.

John, sorry I misread your question. The best answer I can provide might be photos of mine. Your two stampings are indeed closer than mine. Does the close proximity on yours indicate shenanigans or did Fritz at Mauser just like to keep things close? I'll defer to more experienced members on that question. Hopefully they will jump in with their opinions.

[johnb55]

Eugene, thanks for the pictures of your barrel numbers. Our guns are 75 serial numbers apart. Comparing the 9s and 7s on both pistols they look the same. I really don't see any difference in font or size. Looks like my numbers are legit. Any members care to add any thoughts. Moving on to next Luger.

[Sky Zero]

Originally Posted by johnb55

Update on this lugers performance. I got to the range today and fired a couple of clips to see if any issues. Pistol worked fine, cycled with no problems.

I have a question for Eugen. I see that you have a 1939 like mine. I have been looking at this guns barrel numbers. Looking for a verdict if mine is kosher from board. 8.83 very close to serial number.

Thanks John

clips?!?!

[kurusu]

The luger uses magazines.

Those are clips.