![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#20 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
Quote:
Finish on wartime production is usually lower. People could understand that finish being secondary at wartime, so finish was sacrificed. That makes perfect sense. But there is an assumption -- "this was controlled lower". But in late war time, (1) quality did not have to be still under control; (2) quality issue may not limited within finish only. If saying "I still have control on everything, but I just lower finish alone to fit wartime volume", that's simply too ideal. In real world, quality is a systemic thing. It's regarding the quality of the whole supply chain, not a single factory. In theory, lower wartime quality actually makes sense. Combined with today's random test in practice... what else can we do to make conclusion more sound... |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|