LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-23-2002, 03:24 PM   #1
wterrell
User
 
wterrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

[quote]"Parabellum-Carbine .45 Cal. of dubious origin"<hr></blockquote>
The title made a statement that the origin of the .45 carbine was dubious, and then offered no argument or proof that the statement was correct. It made a statement that the dubious origin was fact.

The title did not state that many or some thought that the origin was dubious. The story did not follow the title.

I thought I was going to learn something from this article which would confirm or refute my suspicions concerning this gun. I need better fodder than this to confirm my opinion.

That is tabloid technique to give a title that says one thing and the body of the article says something different. A better title would have been "Parabellum-Carbine .45 Cal....Origin disputed"
__________________
Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo,
wes
--------------------
wterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com