![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,123
Thanked 5,287 Times in 1,728 Posts
|
I looked at the high resolution photos on the PIA site and the mark is a bit of a puzzle. The "M" is without a doubt pantographed, however the crown appears stamped. Looks like someone has a crown stamp but couldn't come up with an M stamp of the proper size.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Ron, Despite PIA's statement to the contrary, their photos are not high resolution and can not be enlarged to show detail. Here is a true high resolution photo of a correct 1908 Commercial Navy and PIA's photo.
Best regards, Norm |
|
|
|
| The following 4 members says Thank You to Norme for your post: |
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
|
I find the PIA crown to be "nesting" too low within the M, giving the impression that the M was added later and not all part of the same stamp.
|
|
|
|
| The following 2 members says Thank You to alanint for your post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|