![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#27 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,040
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,257 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
![]()
I find it highly unlikely that any weapon in the first two shipments were rejected prior to issue. I agree with John that this just does not wash considering the fit and finish of observed Lugers from that time and the fact that DWM was attempting to land what could be a very lucrative contract with the U.S.
What is more likely, and borne out by Ed's post about the 71 pieces returned in 1904 as unserviceable, is that DWM may have provided replacements. This would be unusual, since it is virtually unprecedented for a contractor to replace something the client has screwed up. But, once again, it is plausible because DWM stood to make a lot of money if the U.S. contract came through, and even in those days "money talks". However, by 1907 DWM was in the final phases of negotiation with Germany to provide the Luger as the standard sidearm for the German army (which WAS successful and hence the P08). At that time DWM had pretty much had it with the U.S. demanding and getting preferential treatment. So the rest is history. DWM figuratively told the U.S. to "walk west till your hat floats" and left us without the Luger.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|