Another .45 Luger Question...

Johnny Peppers · 08-14-2002, 10:05 PM

The information from Mike Jones would tend to validate the discussion concerning the possibility of the photographs themselves being the culprit, but I don't see where it would have prevented the discussion. The discussion listed the possible photographic situations that could have caused the grip angle to appear different on two seemingly identical pistols, and apparently that was correct. Should the discussion have ended with Mike's post, or are we not all a little better off knowing that a pistols geometry can be unintentionally changed photographically?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

08-14-2002, 10:05 PM	#27
Johnny Peppers User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Calion, Arkansas Posts: 1,042 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	The information from Mike Jones would tend to validate the discussion concerning the possibility of the photographs themselves being the culprit, but I don't see where it would have prevented the discussion. The discussion listed the possible photographic situations that could have caused the grip angle to appear different on two seemingly identical pistols, and apparently that was correct. Should the discussion have ended with Mike's post, or are we not all a little better off knowing that a pistols geometry can be unintentionally changed photographically?