LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 08-13-2002, 01:47 AM   #10
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Post

Hello All,

Trying to recap what has been posted...sorry I do not yet have the H. Jones book :

If the Norton gun is # 5 (or not numbered..) but is "identical" to the S. Aberman gun # 2; then what gun was photographed in the M. Reese book ?

The gun photographed in the M. Reese book definitely has a different grip angle than the Aberman gun (and also the Norton gun)...

Am I wrong about my perception of this M. Reese gun photo ? It sure seems to show a gun that is different in its grip angle than is shown on the Aberman gun.

I am still a bit confused...(some may say this is my permanent state... [img]biggrin.gif[/img] )
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com