![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#17 | ||||
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 112
Thanked 58 Times in 35 Posts
|
Gosh, this is great! This is exactly what I am talking about: some interesting and lively discussion.
![]() I really like it when folks have, and express opinions, even when they don't agree with mine. That's how we can grow our ways of thinking and gain knowledge. Let me respond to a couple of items: Quote:
Quote:
are comps; and, based upon the comps, I believe the price of the Artillery in question was reasonable. Since the luger sold quickly and I am sure the asking price was close to the actualized price, the asking price will be used in the future as a comp and influence the price of a future Artillery sale. Therefore, the price at which the Artillery in question sold is its valuation *today*. Quote:
two sites and that by using its official name I would summon evil spirits. So, I wanted to comply with what I perceived as an unwritten rule and used it. If there is no enmity or evil spirits associated with it , then I guess I can just say "The Jan C. Still board".Quote:
![]() Though I must confess, I have not been able to verify the Nordic sage part. ![]() To those who feel the 1917 Artillery at SimpsonLtd is over-priced, please provide the reasons for your conclusion. Is it just a gut reaction? I have provided my analysis. Quid Pro Quo.
__________________
"Für Gott, Kaiser, und Vaterland" -seeking: Erfrut Mag 1229 (no script) |
||||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|