Lahti stock attachment

DavidJayUden · 04-21-2015, 10:42 AM

So as to not further clog up the for sale post, or to further upset the handlers, let's start anew. What is the difference between the Lahti and the P08 attachment lug? I don't have my Lahti handy to look at, but as I recall they outwardly appear similar.
dju

sheepherder · 04-21-2015, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavidJayUden

So as to not further clog up the for sale post, or to further upset the handlers, let's start anew. What is the difference between the Lahti and the P08 attachment lug? I don't have my Lahti handy to look at, but as I recall they outwardly appear similar.
dju

The groove/notch for the lock is in a different place. Also, IIRC, the dimensions of the "T" are slightly different. I posted a pic some time back of the Lahti & Luger lugs -

I've never seen a Lahti stock so I have no idea if it used a pushbutton or swinging cam or what...

DavidJayUden · 04-21-2015, 01:03 PM

From this photo the only difference I can see is that location of the detent groove for the locking cam.
Will the P08 stock fit if a second groove is machined into the Lahti?
dju

John Sabato · 04-21-2015, 04:37 PM

Fitting is important, but if the gun is modified as David has suggested, I can't see why the P.08 stock wouldn't be functional... but it would also be federal felony in the USA...

unless pre-registered with BATFE as a short barreled rifle (SBR), and the $200.00 tax had been prepaid. Just sayin'...

hayhugh · 04-21-2015, 05:04 PM

I have a 12" barrel that is attached to the receiver and only needs the toggle bolt to make the attachment. Would I need the fed license to shoot it?

ithacaartist · 04-21-2015, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hayhugh

I have a 12" barrel that is attached to the receiver and only needs the toggle bolt to make the attachment. Would I need the fed license to shoot it?

If it's a pistol that's not on the BATFE exception list, it's generally not legal to put a stock on it. To escape the "short barreled" part, you could have a 16" barrel. This is how the regulation is dealt with in the case of a modern-created or modified pistol with a stock--like a Luger Carbine made from a P.08.

hayhugh · 04-21-2015, 08:59 PM

I have removed the commercial 30 luger barrel assembly (the barrel in the bottom of photo) from the commercial lower part of the gun. I also have a 9mm barrel with a .22 cal insert barrel which I can install by just inserting the toggle bolt. I have the 12" barrel installed on the commercial lower in the photo. Is it legal to shoot any and all of these attachments on the commercial lower?

DavidJayUden · 04-21-2015, 10:17 PM

H:
Not certain what you are asking but that gun is legit as a pistol with any of those barrels, that's not an issue with the BATF, but it is verboten with a shoulder stock.
Part of the old 1934 Gun Control Act, but does not necessarily make sense.
dju

Ron Wood · 04-21-2015, 10:25 PM

Shoot to your heart's content, just do not attach a stock.

04-21-2015, 10:42 AM	#1
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	Lahti stock attachment So as to not further clog up the for sale post, or to further upset the handlers, let's start anew. What is the difference between the Lahti and the P08 attachment lug? I don't have my Lahti handy to look at, but as I recall they outwardly appear similar. dju

04-21-2015, 04:37 PM	#4
John Sabato Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The Capital of the Free World Posts: 10,156 Thanks: 3,003 Thanked 2,308 Times in 1,098 Posts	Fitting is important, but if the gun is modified as David has suggested, I can't see why the P.08 stock wouldn't be functional... but it would also be federal felony in the USA... unless pre-registered with BATFE as a short barreled rifle (SBR), and the $200.00 tax had been prepaid. Just sayin'... __________________ regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL *and are endowed by their Creator* with certain UNALIENABLE* rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."*

04-21-2015, 08:59 PM	#7
hayhugh User Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Florida/Penna Posts: 898 Thanks: 880 Thanked 514 Times in 276 Posts	I have removed the commercial 30 luger barrel assembly (the barrel in the bottom of photo) from the commercial lower part of the gun. I also have a 9mm barrel with a .22 cal insert barrel which I can install by just inserting the toggle bolt. I have the 12" barrel installed on the commercial lower in the photo. Is it legal to shoot any and all of these attachments on the commercial lower? Attached Thumbnails Last edited by hayhugh; 04-21-2015 at 09:05 PM. Reason: add a word or two

04-21-2015, 10:25 PM	#9
Ron Wood Moderator 2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso Posts: 7,040 Thanks: 1,106 Thanked 5,257 Times in 1,724 Posts	Shoot to your heart's content, just do not attach a stock. __________________ If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-21-2015, 01:03 PM	#3
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	From this photo the only difference I can see is that location of the detent groove for the locking cam. Will the P08 stock fit if a second groove is machined into the Lahti? dju

04-21-2015, 05:04 PM	#5
hayhugh User Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Florida/Penna Posts: 898 Thanks: 880 Thanked 514 Times in 276 Posts	I have a 12" barrel that is attached to the receiver and only needs the toggle bolt to make the attachment. Would I need the fed license to shoot it?

04-21-2015, 10:17 PM	#8
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	H: Not certain what you are asking but that gun is legit as a pistol with any of those barrels, that's not an issue with the BATF, but it is verboten with a shoulder stock. Part of the old 1934 Gun Control Act, but does not necessarily make sense. dju