LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Shooting and Reloading

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2014, 11:21 AM   #1
spacecoast
User
 
spacecoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL and PA
Posts: 332
Thanks: 276
Thanked 243 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Quote:
The original DWM round nose ammo was loaded to 1.173 inches.
Can't say for sure without trying, but I have serious doubts as to whether ammo with an OAL of that value would fit into the magazine, especially with the more blunt profile of the bullets I purchased from GT. I loaded mine to 1.145", same as the Western round shown on the right, and they seemed like a pretty tight fit.

You are correct that the specs allow for a max length of 1.175". I will load up a dummy round and verify what the longest round is that I could use in both my Mecgar and older magazines.

spacecoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2014, 06:02 AM   #2
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecoast View Post
Can't say for sure without trying, but I have serious doubts as to whether ammo with an OAL of that value would fit into the magazine, especially with the more blunt profile of the bullets I purchased from GT. I loaded mine to 1.145", same as the Western round shown on the right, and they seemed like a pretty tight fit.

You are correct that the specs allow for a max length of 1.175". I will load up a dummy round and verify what the longest round is that I could use in both my Mecgar and older magazines.

Hi,

Not to beat a dead horse, but you will have to experiment with a full 8 rounds in your magazine, all of exactly the same O.A.L., to test for positive function.

I experimented with Winchester .30 cal. bullets, some 25 or 30 years ago, back when they were commercially available for handloaders. The 1.173 O.A.L. was, indeed, correct for perfect, jam free, function.

Luger cartridges don't just "sit" in a magazine, as, for instance, they do in a 1911's magazine; rather, they ride up the sides of the magazine at somewhat of a sharp angel. This was a major design difference between Browning's 1911 pistol and the Luger pistol. It was caused by that very steeply angled grip of the Luger, as opposed to the straighter 1911 grip angel. This is why proper cartridge O.A.L., in a Luger, is so very critical for proper and trustworthy function. Unfortunately, modern ammo manufacturers have long ago forgotten about making Lugers function properly.


Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-14-2014, 05:35 PM   #3
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

You might want to compare (or experiment with) Hugh's 30 cal Luger loads from 2002 (or earlier)...

http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=9385
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com