![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 20
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Thanks for the well wishes, while I do appreciate and respect your opinion, it is just that an opinion. I will keep this thread updated on any information I find in regards to this firearm, as I said I did find something saying the 1910 marking instructions included " Receivers from reserve stocks, where the year of manufacture does not correspond with the year of completion of the weapon, will receive a 2.1mm high correction for the year of completion behind the manufacture-year in fractional form." while I'm not certain that is true I found it through one singe source and as I have made painfully and rudely apparent I like to confirm opinion before I take it as fact. So I'll continue my quest for fact on this particular firearm. I have had a hard time even finding a photo of a duplicate stamp of this variety, I have seen a few photos of 1918/20 but none 1917/20. I'm not quite sure if this makes it rare or more valuable. At this point its not even really about this rarity or value, its more the fact that its simply irritating not knowing why it is stamped this way. If the information I found about marking instructions is in fact true, why would it have sat for 3 years?
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|