![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,775
Thanks: 4,995
Thanked 3,134 Times in 1,439 Posts
|
Your mag appears likely to be from before 1942, though, 'cause by '42, they had aluminum bottoms. Yeah, WAY before 42... like about 1913-1918. Aluminum bottoms appeared around 1926.
A third mag, if it existed for that gun, would have "++" on it. These are military marks. UUHH NO they wouldn't. An extra mag is an extra is an extra mag and any and all extra mags only have ONE +, indicating it is an extra.
__________________
Jerry Burney 11491 S. Guadalupe Drive Yuma AZ 85367-6182 lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net 928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round 719 207-3331 (cell) "For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know." |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to lugerholsterrepair for your post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,403
Thanks: 7,569
Thanked 2,651 Times in 1,395 Posts
|
Uh-oh, I'm deluded! Well, no longer! I admittedly needed better info about this. An Artillery Luger would have been issued with three mags, right? One for the gun and two for the double pouch? If the two for the pouch were identically serialized and each had only one +, how did a soldier tell the difference later if one of the "extras" was acting up? Is my memory of pics of ++ mags mistaken, or were the mags inappropriately doctored post-issue to create this double+?
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|