LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Navy Lugers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2014, 10:24 AM   #1
JoeP.08
User
 
JoeP.08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

The C/M's look fine to me. These stamps were applied by hand and commonly exhibit imperfections due to broken dies, angle of strike, force of strike, etc. I've never seen a P.04 with two C/M's that are exactly the same. The C/M's on P.04's are applied prior to bluing and do not exhibit halos. The P.04 stampings on the barrels, depending on the model and serial suffix, on the other hand, were applied after bluing and should exhibit halos. IMHO these proofs and serial number look correct to me for a model 1914 P.04 Navy.
__________________
"It's good to be a great man but it's great to be a good man." Joseph F. Pirolo Sr. (1934-2010)
JoeP.08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 10:34 AM   #2
Olle
User
 
Olle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 159
Thanked 664 Times in 318 Posts
Default

I don't know much about these pistols, so this is just a question... These guns were hand fitted at the factory, and I'm sure that most of that needed to be done before bluing. Wouldn't the serial numbers be applied before the bluing then? It seems like it would have been difficult to keep track of the parts through the finishing process if they were unnumbered.
Olle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com