![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#34 | |
|
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,977
Thanks: 2,076
Thanked 4,610 Times in 2,124 Posts
|
don, you believe that barracked Bereitschaftspolizei are the only police that did not get sear safeties?
interesting - that has not been my observation there were many police guns that ended up into the army BEFORE sear safeties were required; such as: Example 1 - 1920 DWM, sn 3004a, property marked to the Polizeiwehr Bayern. As this organization was disbanded in 1922, the pistol never received a sear safety Quote:
Example 3 - DWM military proofed 1920 dated, serial number 8630. This was one of the pistols manufactured under DWM’s Weimar military contract. This pistol was originally issued to the Sachsen Polizeischul and unit stamped P.S. In 1933 the name of the facility was changed to the Saxon Polizeischul at Berg. The original mark was scrubbed and overstamped with the new PBg stamp There is no sear safety, as the police schools were not subject to that requirement Example 4 - This Commercial DWM, with neither sear nor magazine safety, is weapon number 393 issued to the Saxon Police School in the province of Berg. In addition to the c/N Commercial proofs, on the right receiver is found the e/WaA66 Waffenamt acceptance mark and e/H firing proof. My point is that many police guns did not receive a sear safety, and although this one is likely not police, others did not receive a sear safety. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|