![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#2 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
![]()
Boy, I see things that concern me but I'm no G date guy. At the risk of erroring, I would comment that the mag. is a number re-stamp, and I agree that the grips look suspect. If they are numbered correctly inside, then that suggests something a bit more troubling. I'd like to see better photos of that front suffix and the surrounding area, as it looks a bit odd in the photos.
Not sure if the G date guns should have the Mauser hump. Lets hear from the other guys... dju |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|