Two S/42s. I know about the 1937.

318is_Parabellum · 12-13-2013, 10:12 AM

I couldn't figure out how this guy couldn't figure out that his photos were inadequate for identifying tiny proof marks!

I'm no pro photog, but I like to think I know something about taking pictures of mysterious markings on pistols. I understood that if one wants a teensy little mark ID'd, one should take an actual close-up photo of the marking in question!

I still have some questions about my pistols I've posted photos of. I *have* gotten a lot of info from some of the world's foremost luger cognoscenti, and for that I am very grateful.

Very much enjoy this forum and the depth and breadth of experience here, and I am glad to be a member here.

Respectfully,
Jason

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-13-2013, 10:12 AM	#8
318is_Parabellum User Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: West Virginia Posts: 130 Thanks: 80 Thanked 75 Times in 31 Posts	I couldn't figure out how this guy couldn't figure out that his photos were inadequate for identifying tiny proof marks! I'm no pro photog, but I like to think I know something about taking pictures of mysterious markings on pistols. I understood that if one wants a teensy little mark ID'd, one should take an actual close-up photo of the marking in question! I still have some questions about my pistols I've posted photos of. I have gotten a lot of info from some of the world's foremost luger cognoscenti, and for that I am very grateful. Very much enjoy this forum and the depth and breadth of experience here, and I am glad to be a member here. Respectfully, Jason