1900 broken toggle lock ?

lfid · 05-07-2013, 02:06 PM

it seems like the initial opening spring pressure on similiar examples would be interesting to compare - like between a 1906 30 cal with 4.75" bbl versus the 1900 same bbl length

the 1900 shorter coupling link between toogle and the top ears on the 1900 leaf spring versus the 1906 longer link and coil spring hanger hook / bellcrank would seem to have a different geometry to the spring aspect

also 1900 versus 1906 breechblock/toggle would likely have different mass acceleration factor due to 1900 lighter breechblock and heavier toggle

Bill

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

05-07-2013, 02:06 PM	#4
lfid Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Wichita, KS USA Posts: 453 Thanks: 573 Thanked 96 Times in 53 Posts	it seems like the initial opening spring pressure on similiar examples would be interesting to compare - like between a 1906 30 cal with 4.75" bbl versus the 1900 same bbl length the 1900 shorter coupling link between toogle and the top ears on the 1900 leaf spring versus the 1906 longer link and coil spring hanger hook / bellcrank would seem to have a different geometry to the spring aspect also 1900 versus 1906 breechblock/toggle would likely have different mass acceleration factor due to 1900 lighter breechblock and heavier toggle Bill