Newbie: Test case 1936...

[Olle]

Originally Posted by mrerick

As a commercial concern, they need to do better than grainy cellphone pictures for $2500 pistols...

Jackson Armory are bad at putting up blurry pictures of high dollar guns. There could be a reason for that.

[Zorba]

Originally Posted by Olle

Jackson Armory are bad at putting up blurry pictures of high dollar guns. There could be a reason for that.

Frankly, I was puzzled by the terrible pictures. I've seen other J.A. postings that had beautiful pix, dunno Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot is up with these. Most cell phones these days take far better! *shrug*

[Olle]

Originally Posted by zormpas

Frankly, I was puzzled by the terrible pictures. I've seen other J.A. postings that had beautiful pix, dunno Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot is up with these. Most cell phones these days take far better! *shrug*

It doesn't take much to take good pictures nowadays, so it makes you suspect that they don't want you to see everything. Seems like the more expensive the guns get, the crappier the pictures will be.

Right now they have a $4,000 Artillery Luger with pictures that seem to be taken while they were running by with a cell phone camera: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=335794086