![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 2,737
Thanked 993 Times in 729 Posts
|
![]()
I, personally, would consider modern steel to be far superior to the steel produced in the early to mid 1940s. The production equipment and monitoring systems, plus the quality control has progressed markedly over the years. I do not hesitate to shoot my 06/73 Mauser Parabellum in 9mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,144
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
My question would be whether the original steels were adequate to their intended usage? The answer is, obviously, yes, when ammo of the correct formula is used in the various period pistols. Overloaded ammo is, in my opinion, the main cause of Luger parts failure, not some mythical weakness in the original steels used, as hardened with the passage of time. For instance, the current NATO round is loaded some 17% hotter than the standard German Army round of WWI. Firing ammo so overloaded, on a regular basis, through a Luger will, indeed, cause parts failure!!! Sieger |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,144
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I believe I've read here that some of the parts of the Mauser Parabellum series of the 1970's were of cast steel not forged steel. Sieger |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 2,737
Thanked 993 Times in 729 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Many of the modern handgun have parts that are cast steel and MIM, and seem to be holding up well to regular, self defense, and +P loads. It is just better quality material, in my way of thinking, compared to the materials(steels) of the early and mid 20th Century. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|