![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,138 Times in 2,176 Posts
|
![]()
I'm interested in the evolution of the our Navy magazines. It appears that the Navy was the only ones using the concentric grips. Did they change during the Naval service? I would assume they were made to give a better grip in wet or damp surroundings such as those experianced in its Navy. I can imagine the artillerys were even in worse conditions in the trenches, mud and blood. Did they remain the same only on the navys? Any opinions would be helpful! Tks Eric~~
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,525
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 3,709 Times in 1,013 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Eric, I have the reminant of a navy style mag base with the concentric rings and Cal. 9m/m on the bottom... definitly commercial... but, I've only seen one or two ever..
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to G.T. for your post: |
![]() |
#3 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,138 Times in 2,176 Posts
|
![]()
George Anderson just wrote me, "The Navy dropped the concentric rings with the Naval Luger production in 1917. The 1917 mags continue with the Naval accertance and large numerals" I keep telling Him to write a book on the subject!~~~ Eric
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|