LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All Post-WWII Lugers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-18-2013, 09:14 PM   #1
padredan
User
 
padredan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: louisiana Now, but from the Rebublic of Texas
Posts: 937
Thanks: 429
Thanked 316 Times in 182 Posts
Default

nice looking one
__________________
In this world nothing is free, except the grace of God
padredan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-10-2014, 04:38 PM   #2
Johnny C. Kitchens
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Default Magazine...

The Mitchell versions are interchangeable with the originals. It is the Stoeger and following models that are different. Stoeger had a number of parts changed so that interchangeability would not be an option. Mitchell wanted a stainless steel copy, and the parts do swap out.
__________________
Johnny C. Kitchens
Johnny C. Kitchens is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-10-2014, 05:01 PM   #3
hayhugh
User
 
hayhugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Florida/Penna
Posts: 898
Thanks: 893
Thanked 514 Times in 276 Posts
Default

The only part that is not the same is the locking bolt spring. They use a ball bearing/spring combo instead of the bent rod spring. Have not tried to change out every part but that was the only thing that stood out. Paid $900.00 on GB and it turned out better then the photos. Looks like new out of the box (which it came with) extra mag and I found an original Mitchel loading tool (SS) on EBay.

GB item: 433651114

Last edited by hayhugh; 10-10-2014 at 05:10 PM. Reason: More info.
hayhugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-12-2014, 12:48 AM   #4
Johnny C. Kitchens
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Default That And...

The take down lever stands out. I made a picture comparison of the post Stoeger version of the stainless Luger and a BYF 42, showing some differences. It is in the gallery. For instance the back pivot pin is larger in diameter on the stainless. I couldn't swap out the breech block. Other dimensions were just enough different to stop parts swapping on many things I checked. Even the wood grips are larger on the stainless. Now I am talking about the Stoeger and newer, as the Mitchell version, appears to be very close or the same...
__________________
Johnny C. Kitchens
Johnny C. Kitchens is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com