1920 PARTS Navy Luger Carbine

mrerick · 10-30-2012, 05:51 PM

Doug,

Is this where a museum director nomination to the ATF comes in?

I would imagine that things would get difficult during the process since up until approved by the ATF for the list, it would be an unlicensed SBR.

Charles, is there a witness mark where the barrel and receiver are joined that shows it's the original barrel first installed on the receiver? (perfectly straight and even in depth)? Is a picture available?

Because of the flash reflection, I can't see if the trigger is strawed (which I assume). If so it is likely perfect in appearance.

In natural light, how does the woodgrain and finish / stain color compare between the stock and the foregrip and the frame grips?

BTW.... The following description is on the exemption list:

"Luger, DWM Pistol-Carbine, model 1920, 7.65mm or 9mm parabellum cal., with accompanying original commercial type shoulder stock, with or without forearm piece, having barrel lengths of 11-3/4" to less than 16"."

Would that description apply to Charles' pistol? Would the Navy sight be normally on this commercial carbine?

Marc

nukem556 · 10-30-2012, 06:16 PM

VERY thin ice here.....you must apply to make a SBR with the ATF before you start construction of such...and if you appeal to the Feds to declare an existing SBR thats in your posession a Curio and Relic and they say no, guess what? You might as well have a Quad .50 halftrack in your backyard...you're doing felony time in the big house.

10-30-2012, 05:51 PM	#1
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,920 Thanks: 1,377 Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,518 Posts	Doug, Is this where a museum director nomination to the ATF comes in? I would imagine that things would get difficult during the process since up until approved by the ATF for the list, it would be an unlicensed SBR. Charles, is there a witness mark where the barrel and receiver are joined that shows it's the original barrel first installed on the receiver? (perfectly straight and even in depth)? Is a picture available? Because of the flash reflection, I can't see if the trigger is strawed (which I assume). If so it is likely perfect in appearance. In natural light, how does the woodgrain and finish / stain color compare between the stock and the foregrip and the frame grips? BTW.... The following description is on the exemption list: "Luger, DWM Pistol-Carbine, model 1920, 7.65mm or 9mm parabellum cal., with accompanying original commercial type shoulder stock, with or without forearm piece, having barrel lengths of 11-3/4" to less than 16"." Would that description apply to Charles' pistol? Would the Navy sight be normally on this commercial carbine? Marc __________________ Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-30-2012, 06:16 PM	#2
nukem556 User Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Irmo, SC Posts: 625 Thanks: 35 Thanked 168 Times in 107 Posts	VERY thin ice here.....you must apply to make a SBR with the ATF before you start construction of such...and if you appeal to the Feds to declare an existing SBR thats in your posession a Curio and Relic and they say no, guess what? You might as well have a Quad .50 halftrack in your backyard...you're doing felony time in the big house.