![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
if you do research in the current gun blue book it states that Ku lugers should be marked 1941 on the chamber. i do tend to find these books to be wroung alot as i have a 1862 colt pocket navy in 95% condition and every discription for this gun states they had silver plated backstraps..military models didn't..once again experts being wrong.. that why i like lugers so much, they are unusual and tend to turn up with unusual markings on them from time to time.
i won 3 other lugers, a 1917 DWM with natzi barrel( not matching serial number with waffen stamp and natzi eagle with swatstika putting it into the 1934 to 39 rebuild period a 1920 dwm commercial with no germany stamp on it a all matching 1937 mauser S/42, right down to the FXO mag in it |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: south central Kentucky--Tompkinsville
Posts: 33
Thanks: 22
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Harry,
A 1937 S/42 would not have come with a FXO magazine. William
__________________
"The Flag does not fly because of the wind that blows it. The Flag flies because of each soldiers' last breath blows by it!" Unknown |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,974
Thanks: 2,072
Thanked 4,608 Times in 2,123 Posts
|
Quote:
It would make sense in receiving a replacement barrel during that time period - I am always leery of 'rebuilds' but you are correct in that many were rebuilt. Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|