LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 12-31-2011, 07:52 AM   #11
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike B View Post
As far the the witness marks, the difference is so slight, I really don't think there is any cause for concern.
I don't either (struck angle and depth are consistent on both sides); I was curious as to whether anyone else had a reason for the marks to be divergent.

I suppose it's possible the barrel might have been removed to inspect/measure bore erosion or rifling wear; I'm not familiar with any test criteria for any pistol, which was my intent in asking.

I agree; a beautiful Test Luger. I wish I could afford to indulge in acquisitions like this myself...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com