LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Lugerforum Archive

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 02-08-2002, 10:50 AM   #8
BCC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: LUGER FACTS VS. FICTION

mlm, I have generally found the same observations you point out to be true. I would add that many officers bought Lugers, esp before 1940, and I have ancedotal evidence that many of these were military procured examples (ie s/42, 42 marked). Many officers wanted a 9mm for combat wear and a 7.65 for "light duty" wear. This entire area of how Lugers were procured and how officers obtained weapons and equipment is poorly documented (published) and causes great mis-understanding. For example: on Third Reich Naval Lugers I would contend (I can support this view by general available KM Regs) that officer OWNED Lugers will not bear KM property marks. Some property marked Lugers may have been issued to KM officers but not sold to them. The same is true with unit (Army) marked WWI era Lugers. I believe that at least a fair number of Lugers were procured by the KM each year and not marked for the express purpose of selling to new Naval officers.



 
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com