![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#21 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I am not good with a camera hope you can make it out.
Do you guys think it is a fake? Thanks to all you all have a lot of knowledge that I can only work on learning. Eric |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
|
Eric,
I asked the same question years ago. "If it's made after 1918 it's a reproduction" This is Ron's signature. It is at the bottom of all of his post. It's a tongue in cheek statememt.He is partial to early Lugers. It is the last year Erfurt and "DWM" made Lugers. DWM was renamed BKIW after WWI. PS. Your Luger looks fine.
__________________
Mike C. |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to MFC for your post: |
|
|
#23 |
|
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,119
Thanked 5,286 Times in 1,728 Posts
|
That "signature" gets me in more trouble
! I collect the early Imperial era Lugers. Up until 1918 Lugers were only manufactured by DWM and Erfurt. After WWI, manufacture was reverted to other firms (Mauser, Krieghoff, Simson, etc), therefore "original" Lugers by DWM and Erfurt were no longer made, only "repros"...it is a joke, but evidently not a very good one since I have to explain it .
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
|
|
#24 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
oh ok I get it. Sorry since I am new I needed the extra info. Thank You very much for your time and effort in helping me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have a Code 42 dated 1940 with straw colored trigger and other small parts. I was told by the previous owner it is all original. Is this possible or was the Luger refinished at some point? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
|
David,
All 1940/42's were salt blued, dipped, including the small parts. The last of the military Lugers that were rust blued w/strawed small parts was in early 1937. Some of the commercials (Mauser Banners) were still rust blued after that.
__________________
Mike C. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
Hello
very usefull post Jan !!!! I just got a 1940 42 code , all matching, with ( I think ) replaced grips.... according to your pictures the magazine should be of a "square" bottom type, with a small hole inside the"button " My magazine look like those of the 1939 variation, that have "rounded" bottoms and no hole in the "button" .... there are any markings on the magazine body... Do I have a "reworked magazine " ? strange thing : I got exactly the same type of magazine with a swiss 06/29 ( means the second swiss magazine had been replaced with a german one ) but with any marking ?? thanks for a replay |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 544
Thanks: 118
Thanked 383 Times in 158 Posts
|
There was an overlap of two magazine types in early 1940 and both would be correct. One was stamped E/655 like yours. The other was stamped E/37 and 122 on the body and was the newer type. The bottom was center pinned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
Many thanks Tom for your information !
In fact I didn't realise that the hole on side of bottom was for the pinning.....Would be fine if someone having a 42 in the same range of s/n, could tell me he has the same type of magazine |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|