LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-01-2010, 12:58 PM   #1
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

Andrew,

This is a very interesting topic. Please continue to let us know how you progress, with continued excellent pictures--it will be a very good learning experience for all.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-01-2010, 01:29 PM   #2
Macadoon
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default The rod approach

If the gun was loaded, what distance would one expect to measure from the tip of the muzzle to the tip of the bullet?
Converseley, if the gun was unloaded, what distance would one expect to measure from the tip of the muzzle to the back of the unloaded chamber?
Thanks
Macadoon
Macadoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-01-2010, 02:02 PM   #3
Macadoon
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Cutaways would be useful

Hi, can anyone provide this thread with certain photographs of a ww1 luger, probably 1915-16 vintage. I found this one on a 1916 battlefield.
In particular, it would be useful to see the left and right sides of the handle, with the wooden hand plates removed?
I would then know exactly what it is I can see, grime etc on my example noted.
I think that is the magazine that can be seen in the handle in the top photo, and that the slide path can be seen (terminology is a bit off).
I've searched the net, but most of the photos it has appear to be of different models and then only from one side, or with the hand grips still on.
Any help greatly appreciated.
For those experts out there... what do these photos tell you about this luger? Any info is useful as you'll be writing for a complete novice who has caught the bug.
Macadoon
Macadoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-02-2010, 07:00 AM   #4
alvin
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadoon View Post
I found this one on a 1916 battlefield.
Interested in how it was found. I bet millions of people have visited the site, and most won't find guns on ground surface waiting picking up. Found in a trench? in river? under ground?

I would suggest leave it as is without removing the dirt and rust. Since it's battlefield pick up, this is the best fitting.
alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-02-2010, 03:49 PM   #5
Macadoon
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvin View Post
Interested in how it was found. I bet millions of people have visited the site, and most won't find guns on ground surface waiting picking up. Found in a trench? in river? under ground?

I would suggest leave it as is without removing the dirt and rust. Since it's battlefield pick up, this is the best fitting.
I found the luger in a paddock that had been recently ploughed, partially under a clod of earth. It had been raining heavily, so metal objects were relatively easy to spot. Only part of the handle was visible. In fact, truth be told, I thought it was a commonly found piece of shrapnel, and I walked past it. Something ... I don't know what ... made me think twice and revisit the spot for a closer look. Hey presto!
I want to emphasise the point that I did not, and do not condone, digging for such things. Nor do I metal detect, which is illegal on the battlefields of France.
Macadoon
Macadoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-02-2010, 01:56 PM   #6
Douglas Jr.
User
 
Douglas Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South America
Posts: 948
Thanks: 598
Thanked 584 Times in 254 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadoon View Post
Hi, can anyone provide this thread with certain photographs of a ww1 luger, probably 1915-16 vintage. I found this one on a 1916 battlefield.
There were two producers of P.08 pistols at that time: DWM (Deutsche Waffen und Munitionfabriken) and Erfurt (Königlich Preussische Gewehrfabrik Erfurt)
Here are some examples:

DWM 1915: http://www.simpsonltd.com/product_in...6a71fdc1bd4cde

DWM 1916: http://www.simpsonltd.com/product_in...6a71fdc1bd4cde

ERFURT 1916: http://www.simpsonltd.com/product_in...6a71fdc1bd4cde

As you can notice (and according to Vlim's observation), they all look the same concerning its major features: 100mm barrel, fixed sights, caliber 9mm Luger.

Douglas.
Douglas Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-01-2010, 06:02 PM   #7
suum cuique
User
 
suum cuique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD / Currently about 9000 klicks east of the Potomac
Posts: 497
Thanks: 108
Thanked 47 Times in 35 Posts
Default Rod check

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadoon View Post
If the gun was loaded, what distance would one expect to measure from the tip of the muzzle to the tip of the bullet?
Converseley, if the gun was unloaded, what distance would one expect to measure from the tip of the muzzle to the back of the unloaded chamber?
Thanks
Macadoon
You could put in a pencil til the breech block = approx. 10,2cm.
If it's loaded just 7,4cm.
10,2 cm
- 3,00cm
= 7,2cm

(a regular nowaday FMJ 9mm luger cartridge is 30 mm long, WW1 ammo was slightly shorter)
Attached Files
File Type: doc 9mm Parabellum.doc (161.5 KB, 74 views)
__________________
Regards, Andy
There's No Place Like Home (Wizard Of Oz)
suum cuique is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-02-2010, 12:29 PM   #8
A.Mifsin
User
 
A.Mifsin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suum cuique View Post
You could put in a pencil til the breech block = approx. 10,2cm.
If it's loaded just 7,4cm.
10,2 cm
- 0,19cm
= 7,3 cm

(a regular nowaday FMJ 9mm luger cartridge is 19mm long, WW1 ammo was slightly shorter)
Am I correct that .19cm is the case, so you have to add the bullet, which give and take is .30cm. overall.

Alf
__________________
I prefer a Luger
A.Mifsin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2010, 05:24 PM   #9
suum cuique
User
 
suum cuique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD / Currently about 9000 klicks east of the Potomac
Posts: 497
Thanks: 108
Thanked 47 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Mifsin View Post
Am I correct that .19cm is the case, so you have to add the bullet, which give and take is .30cm. overall.

Alf
Yes of course, you are totally right! What was I thinking at the moment
Just the case is .19mm, sorry.
__________________
Regards, Andy
There's No Place Like Home (Wizard Of Oz)
suum cuique is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com