LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Artillery Lugers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-02-2010, 02:17 PM   #1
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

About the high pressure rounds.

The original 9mm Luger (or 9mm parabellum, whatever) round was designed around a slower burning powder that developed a pressure curve that differed from that of most modern 9mm para ammunition. I agree with Ron that modern high pressure rounds like the +P and +P+ stuff should be avoided, although a luger probably outlives that ammo longer than any other pistol (which would also be beaten to pulp with long term use).

Winchester White Box 115gr and Sellier & Bellot 115 and 124gr are rounds that stick close to the original specifications and are absolutely suitable for the luger pistols. For some milder shooting, the S&B subsonic works quite well also.

Bear in mind that the metallurgy of the older lugers (DWM, Erfurt) differs from that of the later Mauser versions and that, close to 100 years old, metal will begin to fail.
Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-02-2010, 02:46 PM   #2
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
Default

I can't speak for the older Lugers, but I have a 41 42 with British proofs. It survived a test round of 15 tons p/s/i (33,600 p/s/i)!
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-02-2010, 02:50 PM   #3
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

Well, if you want to retest a 1917 luger, here's the proof rounds

And alongside some military issue 9mm from january, 1917.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1917_beschuss2.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	96.4 KB
ID:	10677  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1917.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	145.9 KB
ID:	10678  

Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-02-2010, 02:58 PM   #4
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
Default

Hi Vlim, Will you provide the gun as well as the test rounds? Regards
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-02-2010, 03:10 PM   #5
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

Sure,

This old bugger should do. All the bits are 1917
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	LP08_TM_FEW.jpg
Views:	160
Size:	99.5 KB
ID:	10679  

Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2010, 02:16 PM   #6
michael1@windstream.net
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile The solution to the problem.

My gun was doing the same thing. Upon investigation I found the the trigger lever was not pushing the plunger in on the sear back when it jacked in the next round. Instead it was over-riding the plunger and causing the sear to disengage just as the bolt cloesed up on the second round.
I removed the flat spring and sear bar. I then removed the pin from the sear bar that holds in the plunger and spring.
The inside of the plunger hole was clean but the spring was very stiff. Actually the spring was too stiff.
So instead of the trigger lever pushing the plunger in - it was riding over the top of it and disengaging the sear. The plunger is supposed to push in when the bolt returns to battery. When you release the trigger the plunger pops out and the gun can be fired again.
I chose a weaker spring of the same diameter and trimmed it to length. I made sure the plunger worked in and out easily. It doesn't have to have much pressure - just enough to push the plunger out when you release the trigger.
Put it back together and all is well.

Thought this migh put things into to perspective of how and what that little plunger does.

Mike
michael1@windstream.net is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-09-2010, 08:12 AM   #7
rmc
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I can't thank you enough, Mike. Awesome explanation of your problem and how you fixed it.

After getting all of the very helpful information from the Forum, and speaking with several folks, I've decided to field strip the Luger, give it a thorough cleaning, and then put it up for display after a light coat of protective oil. As many of the Forum contributors have written, it is almost 100 years old, and it's not worth stressing the metal/mechanics of the pistol. I'm gong to keep it in as pristine a condition as I can, and then pass it down to my only son. Hopefully, he will have an appreciation of its historical value, and the sentimental value that it has been in the family since his great-uncle brought it home from the war.

Again, many thanks to all who have contributed to my original thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by michael1@windstream.net View Post
My gun was doing the same thing. Upon investigation I found the the trigger lever was not pushing the plunger in on the sear back when it jacked in the next round. Instead it was over-riding the plunger and causing the sear to disengage just as the bolt cloesed up on the second round.
I removed the flat spring and sear bar. I then removed the pin from the sear bar that holds in the plunger and spring.
The inside of the plunger hole was clean but the spring was very stiff. Actually the spring was too stiff.
So instead of the trigger lever pushing the plunger in - it was riding over the top of it and disengaging the sear. The plunger is supposed to push in when the bolt returns to battery. When you release the trigger the plunger pops out and the gun can be fired again.
I chose a weaker spring of the same diameter and trimmed it to length. I made sure the plunger worked in and out easily. It doesn't have to have much pressure - just enough to push the plunger out when you release the trigger.
Put it back together and all is well.

Thought this migh put things into to perspective of how and what that little plunger does.

Mike
rmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-09-2010, 09:34 AM   #8
alvin
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlim View Post
The original 9mm Luger (or 9mm parabellum, whatever) round was designed around a slower burning powder
That's very unusual on pistol cartridge.

Q1: Was it because that DWM did not know fast burning being important in the early stage of auto pistol cartridge design, or was it because they had other concerns or considerations?

Q2: Was slow burning powder unique on DWM 487C (?), or universal on their other pistol cartridges of that era?

TIA
alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com