Russian capture "Ku" Luger (NOW WITH GOOD PICS)

heers68 · 12-12-2009, 11:29 AM

Thanks Norme, I will try to get pics with my camera soon. Still amazed as a Russian capture that the numbers match!? Maybe because I,m a K98 guy too and they are TOTALLY mismatched as RC guns! Wonder if a different facility did pistols??What is your oppinion on the mag marked "2/1001"? Also,is it correct for there to be no serial# on the barrel on these Ku's?

DJU, appreciate your learned input! So you believe this to be rebarreled since there is no serial# on barrel?? Why are these mags so different in construction? I think numbers are forced on the 2/1001 mag and I am wondering if its a post WW2 mag?

Much appreciated! Kevin.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-12-2009, 11:29 AM	#8
heers68 User Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: N.C. Posts: 24 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Thanks Norme, I will try to get pics with my camera soon. Still amazed as a Russian capture that the numbers match!? Maybe because I,m a K98 guy too and they are TOTALLY mismatched as RC guns! Wonder if a different facility did pistols??What is your oppinion on the mag marked "2/1001"? Also,is it correct for there to be no serial# on the barrel on these Ku's? DJU, appreciate your learned input! So you believe this to be rebarreled since there is no serial# on barrel?? Why are these mags so different in construction? I think numbers are forced on the 2/1001 mag and I am wondering if its a post WW2 mag? Much appreciated! Kevin.