![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,197
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() When you come right down to it, the best advice is... Trust...No One... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So be careful what you wish for ![]() Anyway, back on topic. The key points sofar that point towards Bulgarian rather than Russian origin in my opinion are: -The markings are Bulgarian, not Russian. -During the contract years, Bulgaria was severing it's ties with the Ottoman (Turkish) empire. -Early documents, including one from Hans Tauscher, of 1906, and of the Swiss KTA, of 1911 only mention Bulgarian contracts, not Russian. -Bulgaria had enough Mosin-Nagants to validate the use of M-N rifles on the chamber. The issues that need to be resolved are. -The fact that DWM was not allowed to sell to Bulgaria between 1907 and 1914 as a result of a cartel agreement with Steyr. -No historical record of these lugers in contemporary Russian and Bulgarian documents found sofar. -No recollection by August Weiss about these contracts, which suggest that, if they took place, they took place long before WW1. Some consolidation: -Bulgarian archives appear to be well preserved. -Cartel agreement between Steyr and DWM means that DWM could only deliver to Bulgaria with approval of Steyr: Hence, possible proof in Steyr / Austrian archives. -Russian archives are well preserved as well. The bad news: -DWM archives used to light the stove and as improvised kleenex during crisis times. -Most of us lack Bulgarian and Russian language capabilities. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|