Commercial Luger ID Mystery

Hugo Borchardt · 06-05-2009, 09:28 AM

Vern:

I would definitely like to continue the exercise as long as you and others are interested. This is a clinic.

I'm having a hard time making the measurement. Because of the curvature of the barrel, it look like the measurement needs to be taken on the front (barrelside) of the lug to get the 2.3 mm. (13.2-10.9). I'll grab a micrometer from my office and measure the entire expected 24.6 mm from the bottom of the lug to the top of the receiver this afternoon. If there is an easier way to take the measurement, please advise.

I'll also grab a copy of that CD.

Clark

06-05-2009, 09:28 AM	#20
Hugo Borchardt User Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Tennessee Posts: 372 Thanks: 340 Thanked 143 Times in 48 Posts	Vern: I would definitely like to continue the exercise as long as you and others are interested. This is a clinic. I'm having a hard time making the measurement. Because of the curvature of the barrel, it look like the measurement needs to be taken on the front (barrelside) of the lug to get the 2.3 mm. (13.2-10.9). I'll grab a micrometer from my office and measure the entire expected 24.6 mm from the bottom of the lug to the top of the receiver this afternoon. If there is an easier way to take the measurement, please advise. I'll also grab a copy of that CD. Clark __________________ My militaria collection is dedicated to the memory of my Grandfather, Marine Gunnery Sergeant Dave Hill, Jr., wounded in action at The Assault of the Second Marine Division on Betio Island, Tarawa Atoll, 20-23 November, 1943. http://www.tarawa1943.com/pages/casualties%20tarawa.htm

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode