sig for luger? good idea?

alvin · 03-19-2009, 04:45 PM

I had a SIG 239 .40S&W in the past. Originally, I had planned to buy a 229, but I found the grip was too big for my hand. Under recommendation of sales, "239 should be fine, even woman could hold it."..... although I still felt the grip was big, but should I admit my hand being smaller than a woman? So I bought it. It's a solid gun. But after shooting a few boxes, I felt uncomfortable with the size of the grip so I sold it later. If I remembered right, it's $500-$600, super range performer. 228/229 should not be too far away. I always prefer SIG over Glock. The only shortcoming is the grip size.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

03-19-2009, 04:45 PM	#5
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	I had a SIG 239 .40S&W in the past. Originally, I had planned to buy a 229, but I found the grip was too big for my hand. Under recommendation of sales, "239 should be fine, even woman could hold it."..... although I still felt the grip was big, but should I admit my hand being smaller than a woman? So I bought it. It's a solid gun. But after shooting a few boxes, I felt uncomfortable with the size of the grip so I sold it later. If I remembered right, it's $500-$600, super range performer. 228/229 should not be too far away. I always prefer SIG over Glock. The only shortcoming is the grip size.