![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
Hold open has been added, note the proof on the right side of the frame.
I also see a crown N on the toggle. also: Is that a proof mark on the back side of the frame? Vern |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 103
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
It would be interesting to se some pic underneath the barrel, and on top of the front sight blade to see if that has been replaced.
__________________
Regards: Ingvar |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 103
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Thanks.
The proof mark on top of the front sight base means tha the front sight has been replaced, most likely at the same time the hold open was added. There are no ser# on the barrel and the alignment mark at the front sight is missing which tells us that the barrel is likely a reaplacement. On couple of those pics it looks like there is a faint proof mark on the right sight of the chamber which is correct. Also it is possible this pistol has an early reblue as the pin for the hold open should be in white, not blue. That could also explain the faint proof marks. Please correct me if I�´m wrong.
__________________
Regards: Ingvar |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Just by looking at it, it looks like it has been re-blued at some point a while ago. Although the dealer claimed that it had not. The dealer clearly misrepresented it to me, which is disheartening. I'm hoping to ballpark a year of manufacture just for my information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 103
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Well: At least the frame is 1909-1913 military, as can be seen by the added hold open and replaced front sight, which was done in 1913, but the top makes it a bit confusing. 1909 is the only year not having the year stamped on top of the chamber, but then the proof marks should be on the left side of the chamber. Also most of the numbered parts should have the numbers "hidden" for that year.
In 1910 the proof marks are moved to the right side, and the year stamped on top of the chamber. I am not sure about the serial numbers for 1910-1913 but as far as I know yours could fit in the 1909 ser# range. If you look at my album you can see how the markings are suposed to be on 1909 P08 http://forum.lugerforum.com/album.php?albumid=60
__________________
Regards: Ingvar |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for all the information Ingvarg,
It doesn't look like anyone removed any of the markings, I don't know why they would anyway. I wonder if it was "doctored" in any way. At any rate hopefully it will shoot ok. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
No. I don't see any proof marks on the back of the frame. I added some more photos of that area.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|